| | KOMISJA NADZORU FINANSOWEGO | | | | | | | Raport bieżący nr | 81 | / | 2016 | | | | | | Data sporządzenia: | 2016-05-19 | | | | | | | | | | | Skrócona nazwa emitenta | | | | | | | | | | E-STAR ALTERNATIV ENERGIASZOLGALTATO NYRT. | | | | Temat | | | | | | | | | | | | | Announcement | | | | Podstawa prawna | | | | | | | | | | Treść raportu: | | | | | | | | | | | | ENEFI Energy Efficiency Plc _“Company"_ hereby informs its Honourable Investors that
according to the information received from the Romanian operations:
1_ The Metropolitan Court rejected the appeal of the Financial Authority in the lawsuit
related to the affiliated company _Distriterm_ of the Company in Zalău; therefore the
decision of the first instance Court that the Financial Authority shall not enforce its claim of
RON 932,730 against Distriterm and its existing claim is only RON 250,000 of tax from the
sale of the backbone line has become final.
The antecedent of the case is that in spite of the two final decisions stating that on the one
hand the Financial Authority of Zalău lost its right for collection of a claim of RON 932,730
and on the other hand this claim shall be taken out from the books of Distriterm; the
Financial Authority stated that its claim exists and the court decisions stating the opposite
are not valid against the Authority. The liquidator challenged the decision of the Financial
Authority and the Financial Authority filed proceedings demanding that the liquidator shall
count the claim of RON 932,730 of the Financial Authority to its debt towards Distriterm.
The debt of the Financial Authority of Zalău against Distriterm is currently RON 474,000 VAT
from the sale of the backbone line, therefore as a result of the above decision; the Financial
Authority is obliged to pay Distriterm.
2_ The Harghita County Tribunal rejected the action filed against the Gheorgheni affiliated
company of the Company in relation to the interest claim for the concession fee of RON
583,888 by the City of Gheorgheni. | | |
